Previous

The Plight of the Uncool Sociologist

Next

Can We Predict Earthquakes?

January 26, 2010, 11:14 PM ET

What Good Are the Bin Laden Tapes?

Over the weekend a new Osama bin Laden tape appeared in which bin Laden (or someone claiming to be him) takes credit, sort of, for the botched Christmas day airliner bombing. Why he's taking credit for screw-ups I don't know, but it's the first we've heard from him in a while, and so people are trying to figure out what it all means.


Coincidentally, my article just came out on the research of Flagg Miller, a linguistic anthropologist, who has spent several years listening to the personal audiotape collection of the al-Qaeda leader (you can hear a podcast here. It features excerpts of the tapes themselves along with further thoughts from Miller). These tapes are not Official Statements but rather more intimate recordings that shed light on how jihadis talk to each other.

One question addressed briefly in the article and also in the podcast is: What good are these tapes? I was thinking about that when I came across this sentence in John Horgan's recent book Walking Away from Terrorism: Accounts of Disengagement from Radical and Extremist Movements:

"Critical to the success of any counter-terrorism initiative is a clearer understanding of the role of community and how the individual terrorist engages with their community."

That's part of what Flagg Miller is attempting to do in his research: to understand how terrorist communities work. Some of the tapes in the collection include everyday conversation among jihadis and from them you do get a somewhat clearer picture of how they relate to one another, how they form connections, how they see themselves. And that seems of more than just academic interest.

I should note that Miller and Horgan take very different scholarly approaches. Miller comes to the topic as an anthropologist: He's not explicitly offering strategies for combatting terrorism. Meanwhile, Horgan, who is director of the International Center for the Study of Terrorism at Penn State, is doing exactly that.  Both, though, are trying to get inside the mind of the average jihadi.

                                                          ----------------

If you like, you can follow Percolator on Twitter. Or go here for more entries. 

  • Print
  • Comment (2)

Comments

1. johntoradze - January 27, 2010 at 12:32 pm

If someone wants to get inside the mind of a jihadi, they need a prerequisite. First, they must have at least been a fanatic of some religion or doctrine, or tried to be a fanatic. Without that background, any attempt to understand jihadis is a ridiculous farce. Without that background, attempts to understand them are like an Eskimo writing about the mind of an English literature professor in Connecticut.

I would also recommend reading the book "Shantaram", particularly the section from chapter 30 onward. This is an inside view from a westerner who blundered into jihad during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. I think this helps bridge the gap between our cultures better than most.

2. mikerol - January 29, 2010 at 08:54 pm

I feel like saying: "Of course." When people are making breakfast they are pretty much the same. What did you expect? They sound like incompetent novice boyscouts, evidently they are not yet familiar with their butane heater! Otherwise, they appear very well motivated, religion will do that, and full of vengeance, a great motivator, too. To the point of self-destruction - which is what differentiates them, appears to make them incomprehensible. MICHAEL ROLOFF

http://analytic-comments.blogspot.com/
http://summapolitico.blogspot.com/
http://handke-discussion.blogspot.com/

http://www.facebook.com/mike.roloff1?ref=name
Member Seattle Psychoanalytic Institute and Society
This LYNX will LEAP you to my HANDKE project sites and BLOGS:

http://www.roloff.freehosting.net/index.html
"MAY THE FOGGY DEW BEDIAMONDIZE YOUR HOOSPRINGS! +
THE FIREPLUG OF FILIALITY REINSURE YOUR BUNGHOLE!" {J. Joyce}
"Sryde Lyde Myde Vorworde Vorhorde Vorborde" [von Alvensleben]
"Siena me fe, disfescimi Maremma." [Dante]
"Ennui [Lange Weile] is the dreambird that hatches the egg of
experience." Walter Benjamin, the essay on Leskov.

Add Your Comment

Commenting is closed.